|
Riddles, Mysteries, Enigmas - FH 113
|
|
Q: Was Winston Churchill fond of turtle soup?A: Soup and meat both. Researching Churchill's visits to Virginia before our 1998 conference, the catering department at the Williamsburg Inn uncovered correspondence following Churchill's request for Maryland Terrapin. They looked around for a supplier (the war had dried up most sources) and finally found one. The supplier reported that there were three grades. Grade 3 was "only fed to pigs"; grade 2 was "only eaten by [censored]." But grade 1 was probably "all right." Churchill got grade 1! Q: During what period was Winston Churchill Chancellor of Bristol University? A. From the website of Bristol University, www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/ Churchill/Churchill/Churchill.htm --Churchill Hall, opened in 1956, "is named after Sir Winston Churchill, who was Chancellor of Bristol University from 1929 until his death in 1965." There are 180 matches to "Churchill" on the B.U. website, most related to University activities.Q: What did Churchill do about keeping Parliament in session when the House of Commons was bombed during the Blitz? A: The House of Commons moved across the road to Church House, Westminster, and then back to the Palace of Westminster, occupying the chamber of the House of Lords at the other end of the building, where it remained till the new House of Commons was built after the war.Q: How many times did Churchill visit the United States? A: Fifteen: 1895, 1900-01, 1929, 1931-32, 1941-42, 1942, 1943 (twice: May and August), 1946, 1949, 1951, 1952, 1954, 1959, 1961. The hyphenated dates mean he stayed over New Year's. Details are in the official biography and Robert Pilpel's excellent Churchill in America 1895-1961: An Affectionate Portrait (NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich 1976) chronicles each visit in detail. Mr. Pilpel has released the rights to his book to The Churchill Center, but we haven't got round to it yet. Finest Hour would welcome a good article recapping Churchill's visits to America.Q: I keep wondering how Churchill, let alone Roosevelt, kept popping up in places such as Moscow, Teheran, Yalta and Morocco during the height of the war. I'm assuming he flew. But at what a risk to British morale? The only route from Britain to Moscow free of potential German air patrols would take him to Gibraltar and then across the Sahara and up through the Caucasus. So how was it done? Would he use many escorts or try to slip through with as little fanfare as possible? Any suggestions for further research? A: Good question. Actually, Churchill's presence at distant locations was a morale booster, since it underscored that he could not be "grounded" by the enemy. Churchill deserved commendation for undertaking, in his mid-60s, so many dangerous flights in badly-heated, slow and uncomfortable aircraft. Although the summit meetings between them were vital to the war effort, neither Roosevelt nor Stalin logged so many miles so often.Q: Can anyone tell me when Churchill ceased to be Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports? A: Churchill was Lord Warden until 24 January 1965 (the day he died). After his death he was succeeded by Australia's Sir Robert Menzies. Upon Menzies' death in 1978 the Lord Wardenship passed to Earl Mountbatten of Burma. Following Mountbatten's murder in 1979 the Lord Warden became H.M. Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother. Her Majesty remains the current Lord Warden. -Rafal Heydel-MankooRiddles Revisited: More on Churchill and the Atomic Bomb by Craig Horn "Riddles, Mysteries, Enigmas" in Finest Hour 111 carried a question concerning Churchill's attitude toward the use of the two atomic bombs against Japan in World War II. We reported that he favored the use of both. It was recently related to us that then-General Dwight Eisenhower was against the use of at least the second (Nagasaki) bomb, which he regarded as unnecessary. Concerning which, some observations. No End Save Victory: Perspectives on World War II, edited by Robert Cowley (G.P. Putnam's Sons, New York 2001), is a collection of essays by distinguished historians. The very last essay, entitled "The Voice of the Crane," by Thomas B. Allen and Norman Polmar, reveals that in spite of the bombs, and Hirohito's recorded proclamation accepting President Truman's Potsdam Proclamation demanding unconditional surrender, elements of the Japanese Supreme Council for the Direction of the War, including Korechika Anami, Admiral Soemu Toyoda and General Yoshijiro Umezu, supported a coup that would remove the Emperor. They would destroy the surrender recording, engage the Allies in a fight to the death on the home islands, and turn American opinion against the war, forcing a negotiated peace. Hirohito's "surrender" message (which, by the way, never acknowledged surrender nor any remorse for any Japanese actions in the war) was not broadcast live because he was not an accomplished public speaker and did not want the Japanese people, most of whom had never before heard his voice, to hear him stumble or stutter. Two readings were completed and two sets of two-record 78 rpm recordings were made. The Imperial Japanese Army headquarters sent statements to the newspapers after the bombing that the army would fight on. But the coup, supported by some members of the cabinet, ultimately failed as we now know. Still, several members of the cabinet and many more military officers committed seppuku. Before the recordings could be played, members of the coup attempted to take over the NHK radio studio and prevent the broadcast. At noon on August 15, the "voice of the crane" was heard for the first time by that generation when Hirohito announced the surrender. This was at 6 P.M. the previous day in Washington, in time for President Truman to add to his address the American people that the war was over. The credentials of the authors are impressive insofar as they have collaborated on seven books. Mr. Polmar, a defense analyst, is the author or co-author of more than thirty books. Of course, as in all things, "believe but verify." I believe, but have not yet verified. |